Apparently, this value is reserved and may be interpreted as changing doorbell ownership. Even though we're not observing any side effects now, let's skip over it to be consistent with the spec. v2: Apply checkpatch (Sagar) Suggested-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c index 07289a4b5bfa..0b61bf18c3f4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c @@ -475,9 +475,12 @@ static void guc_ring_doorbell(struct i915_guc_client *client) /* pointer of current doorbell cacheline */ db = __get_doorbell(client); - /* we're not expecting the doorbell cookie to change behind our back */ + /* + * We're not expecting the doorbell cookie to change behind our back, + * we also need to treat 0 as a reserved value. + */ cookie = READ_ONCE(db->cookie); - WARN_ON_ONCE(xchg(&db->cookie, cookie + 1) != cookie); + WARN_ON_ONCE(xchg(&db->cookie, cookie + 1 ?: cookie + 2) != cookie); /* XXX: doorbell was lost and need to acquire it again */ GEM_BUG_ON(db->db_status != GUC_DOORBELL_ENABLED); -- 2.13.6 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
