Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-10-25 10:06:01) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index bafe1cdd57d8..08bbceaeb9b8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -3349,6 +3349,7 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) > > intel_engines_mark_idle(dev_priv); > i915_gem_timelines_mark_idle(dev_priv); > + i915_pmu_gt_idle(dev_priv); Heads up, the new trend here is to use "park". Does i915_pmu_park_gt() or i915_pmu_gt_park() work for you? > > GEM_BUG_ON(!dev_priv->gt.awake); > dev_priv->gt.awake = false; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > index d140fcf5c6a3..165988932c8b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static void mark_busy(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > i915_update_gfx_val(i915); > if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 6) > gen6_rps_busy(i915); > + i915_pmu_gt_active(i915); And unpark here. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
