Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-10-20 14:11:53)
> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > In the idle worker we drop the prolonged GT wakeref used to cover such
> > essentials as interrupt delivery. (When a CS interrupt arrives, we also
> > assert that the GT is awake.) However, it turns out that 10ms is not
> > long enough to be assured that the last CS interrupt has been delivered,
> > so bump that to 200ms, and move the entirety of that wait to before we
> > take the struct_mutex to avoid blocking. As this is now a potentially
> > long wait, restore the earlier behaviour of bailing out early when a new
> > request arrives.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > index 026cb52ece0b..d3a638613857 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > @@ -3281,8 +3281,8 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> > container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), gt.idle_work.work);
> > - struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> > bool rearm_hangcheck;
> > + ktime_t end;
> >
> > if (!READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.awake))
> > return;
> > @@ -3291,14 +3291,22 @@ i915_gem_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > * Wait for last execlists context complete, but bail out in case a
> > * new request is submitted.
> > */
> > - wait_for(intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv), 10);
> > - if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.active_requests))
> > - return;
> > + end = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 200);
> > + do {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.active_requests) ||
> > + work_pending(work))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv))
> > + break;
> > +
> > + usleep_range(100, 500);
> > + } while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), end));
> >
>
> Why can't we just wait_for(intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv, 200)) ?
That return. We don't really want to block the ordered wq for 200ms when
we already know we won't make progress. (Whilst we are running nothing
else that wants to use dev_priv->wq can.)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
