Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/guc: Restore GuC interrupts across suspend/reset if enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/10/2017 07:47, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
In order to override the disable/enable control of GuC interrupts during
suspend/reset cycle we are creating two new functions suspend/restore
guc_interrupts which check if interrupts were enabled and disable them
on suspend and enable them on resume. They are used to restore interrupts
across reset as well.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c     | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h     |  2 ++
  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 897fe7e..742ab5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -3768,8 +3768,10 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  		 * The display has been reset as well,
  		 * so need a full re-initialization.
  		 */
+		intel_suspend_guc_interrupts(&dev_priv->guc);
  		intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev_priv);
  		intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
+		intel_restore_guc_interrupts(&dev_priv->guc);
intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
  		intel_modeset_init_hw(dev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index fbd27ea..1e5abf2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -261,6 +261,25 @@ int intel_guc_auth_huc(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 rsa_offset)
  	return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
  }
+void intel_suspend_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+
+	if (!guc->interrupt_clients) {
+		spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	gen6_disable_pm_irq(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_guc_events);
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+	synchronize_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
+
+	intel_reset_guc_interrupts(guc);
+}

Looks awfully similar to intel_put_guc_interrupts, minus the guc->interrupt_clients handling and single bit vs all. I am thinking if it could be consolidated somehow...

Maybe add __intel_put_guc_interrupts which does not touch guc->interrupt_clients and takes in a bitmask of all interrupt clients?

void __intel_put_guc_interrupts(..., unsigned long mask)
{
	assert_lock_held...

	if ((mask & guc->interrupt_clients) != guc->interrupt_clients)
		return;

	... do the irq disable stuff..
}

void intel_suspend_guc_interrupts(...)
{
	spin_lock...

	__intel_put_guc_interrupts(.., guc->interrupt_clients);

	spin_unlock...
}

void intel_put_guc_interrupts(..., id)
{
	spin_lock...

	__intel_put_guc_interrupts(.., BIT(id));
	__clear_bit(guc->interrupt_clients, id);

	spin_unlock...
}

Maybe some logic mistakes here, beware. :)

+
  /**
   * intel_guc_suspend() - notify GuC entering suspend state
   * @dev_priv:	i915 device private
@@ -274,8 +293,7 @@ int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
  		return 0;
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
-		intel_put_guc_interrupts(guc, GUC_INTR_CLIENT_LOG);
+	intel_suspend_guc_interrupts(guc);
ctx = dev_priv->kernel_context; @@ -289,6 +307,21 @@ int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	return intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
  }
+void intel_restore_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+
+	if (guc->interrupt_clients) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(I915_READ(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv)) &
+				       dev_priv->pm_guc_events);
+		gen6_enable_pm_irq(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_guc_events);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+}

And ofc something similar like the above to consolidate the get/restore as well.

+
  /**
   * intel_guc_resume() - notify GuC resuming from suspend state
   * @dev_priv:	i915 device private
@@ -302,8 +335,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
  		return 0;
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
-		intel_get_guc_interrupts(guc, GUC_INTR_CLIENT_LOG);
+	intel_restore_guc_interrupts(guc);
ctx = dev_priv->kernel_context; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 4d58bf7..c55dcba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -125,5 +125,7 @@ static inline u32 guc_ggtt_offset(struct i915_vma *vma)
  void intel_get_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc, enum guc_intr_client id);
  void intel_put_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc, enum guc_intr_client id);
  void intel_guc_irq_handler(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 pm_iir);
+void intel_suspend_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc);
+void intel_restore_guc_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc);
#endif


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux