Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/pm_rps: Move some test logic out of boost function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/17/2017 6:13 PM, Radoslaw Szwichtenberg wrote:
Moving code out of the boost function will allow its usage
in other/new test scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/pm_rps.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/pm_rps.c b/tests/pm_rps.c
index 89f3e31c..dad87646 100644
--- a/tests/pm_rps.c
+++ b/tests/pm_rps.c
@@ -583,11 +583,6 @@ static void boost_freq(int fd, int *boost_freqs)
  	int64_t timeout = 1;
  	igt_spin_t *load;
  	unsigned int engine;
-	int fmid = (origfreqs[RPn] + origfreqs[RP0]) / 2;
-
-	fmid = get_hw_rounded_freq(fmid);
-	/* Set max freq to less then boost freq */
-	writeval(sysfs_files[MAX].filp, fmid);
/* Put boost on the same engine as low load */
  	engine = I915_EXEC_RENDER;
@@ -604,9 +599,6 @@ static void boost_freq(int fd, int *boost_freqs)
  	igt_spin_batch_end(load);
  	gem_sync(fd, load->handle);
  	igt_spin_batch_free(fd, load);
-
-	/* Set max freq to original softmax */
-	writeval(sysfs_files[MAX].filp, origfreqs[MAX]);
  }
static void waitboost(int fd, bool reset)
@@ -615,6 +607,9 @@ static void waitboost(int fd, bool reset)
  	int boost_freqs[NUMFREQ];
  	int post_freqs[NUMFREQ];
+ int fmid = (origfreqs[RPn] + origfreqs[RP0]) / 2;
+	fmid = get_hw_rounded_freq(fmid);
+
How about function for getting mid? We can reuse in min_max_config too.
  	load_helper_run(LOW);
igt_debug("Apply low load...\n");
@@ -627,11 +622,17 @@ static void waitboost(int fd, bool reset)
  		sleep(1);
  	}
+ /* Set max freq to less than boost freq */
+	writeval(sysfs_files[MAX].filp, fmid);
+
  	/* When we wait upon the GPU, we want to temporarily boost it
  	 * to maximum.
  	 */
  	boost_freq(fd, boost_freqs);
+ /* Set max freq to original softmax */
+	writeval(sysfs_files[MAX].filp, origfreqs[MAX]);
+
  	igt_debug("Apply low load again...\n");
  	sleep(1);
  	stabilize_check(post_freqs);
@@ -643,7 +644,6 @@ static void waitboost(int fd, bool reset)
  	igt_assert_lt(pre_freqs[CUR], pre_freqs[MAX]);
  	igt_assert_eq(boost_freqs[CUR], boost_freqs[BOOST]);
  	igt_assert_lt(post_freqs[CUR], post_freqs[MAX]);
-
  }
static void pm_rps_exit_handler(int sig)
@@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ static void pm_rps_exit_handler(int sig)
  		writeval(sysfs_files[MAX].filp, origfreqs[MAX]);
  	}
+ writeval(sysfs_files[BOOST].filp, origfreqs[BOOST]);
We are not changing boost_freq in current patch. Is this planned in new testcase?
Please defer this change until then.
  	load_helper_deinit();
  	close(drm_fd);
  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux