It has now lost its meaning (it shows more than just pin_display), I do
not believe that we are using in preference to the complete listing from
i915_gem_gtt, or the listing from i915_gem_framebuffer, or the listing
of active display objects in i915_display_info.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index fb9b34302811..7053d71b1ca9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -568,7 +568,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(node);
struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
- bool show_pin_display_only = !!node->info_ent->data;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
u64 total_obj_size, total_gtt_size;
int count, ret;
@@ -579,9 +578,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
total_obj_size = total_gtt_size = count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list, global_link) {
- if (show_pin_display_only && !obj->pin_global)
- continue;
-
seq_puts(m, " ");
describe_obj(m, obj);
seq_putc(m, '\n');
@@ -4751,7 +4747,6 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
{"i915_capabilities", i915_capabilities, 0},
{"i915_gem_objects", i915_gem_object_info, 0},
{"i915_gem_gtt", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0},
- {"i915_gem_pin_display", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, (void *)1},
{"i915_gem_stolen", i915_gem_stolen_list_info },
{"i915_gem_request", i915_gem_request_info, 0},
{"i915_gem_seqno", i915_gem_seqno_info, 0},
--
2.15.0.rc0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
