Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2017-10-12 23:30:40) > We already had coverage in prime_vgem.c, but since we're testing > pread/pwrite ioctl it makes more sense to have it in the corresponding > test binaries Redundancy is not an issue (sometimes it is a virtue, the slight variations in test setup lead to wider coverage and serendipity - when we don't have a fuzzer, we have to rely on random variations between authors). The purpose of each test is different, one is testing prime and interactions with i915 on/from a foreign bo; the other looking at pwrite/pread in depth. Each subtest is meaningful as part of the encompassing test. The counter proposal is to be able to select a cross-selection of subtests for a given set of tags/functions/code. And we still need a fuzzer, model based or not. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
