On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, "Chauhan, Madhav" <madhav.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:47 PM
>> To: Chauhan, Madhav <madhav.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-
>> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Hiremath, Shashidhar <shashidhar.hiremath@xxxxxxxxx>; Shankar, Uma
>> <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Chauhan, Madhav
>> <madhav.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Parse DSI backlight/cabc ports.
>>
>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2017, Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > This patch parse DSI backlight/cabc ports info from VBT and save them
>> > inside local strucutre. This saved info can be directly used while
>> > initializing DSI for different platforms instead of parsing for each
>> > platform.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 63
>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index b7cba89..fc472bb 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> > @@ -1751,6 +1751,8 @@ struct intel_vbt_data {
>> > u8 seq_version;
>> > u32 size;
>> > u8 *data;
>> > + u16 bl_ports;
>> > + u16 cabc_ports;
>>
>> This is right in the middle of the sequence data. Please move up e.g. between
>> pps and seq_version.
>
> Ok.
>
>>
>> > const u8 *sequence[MIPI_SEQ_MAX];
>> > } dsi;
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> > index 3747d8d..88a72cc 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> > @@ -730,6 +730,56 @@ parse_psr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> const struct bdb_header *bdb)
>> > dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time =
>> > psr_table->tp2_tp3_wakeup_time; }
>> >
>> > +static void parse_dsi_backlight_ports(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> > + u16 version, enum port port) {
>> > + if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dual_link && version < 197) {
>> > + /*
>> > + * These fields are introduced from the VBT version 197
>> onwards,
>> > + * so making sure that these bits are set zero in the previous
>> > + * versions.
>> > + */
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_cabc_ports = 0;
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_backlight_ports = 0;
>>
>> You could remove this in patch 2. Nobody should be looking at it anymore.
>
> Patch 2 means?? Next version of this patch or patch 2 of this series.
> Patch 2 of this series doesn't use these variables. Please clarify.
After patch 2 of this series, the initialization of these two fields is
unnecessary, so please remove the above lines in patch 2.
>
>>
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.bl_ports = 0;
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports = 0;
>>
>> This you don't have to do anyway, it's all zeros by default.
>
> Ok.
>
>>
>> > + return;
>> > + } else if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dual_link) {
>> > + switch (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_backlight_ports) {
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_A:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.bl_ports = BIT(PORT_A);
>> > + break;
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_C:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.bl_ports = BIT(PORT_C);
>> > + break;
>> > + default:
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_A_AND_C:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.bl_ports = BIT(PORT_A) |
>> BIT(PORT_C);
>> > + break;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + switch (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_cabc_ports) {
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_A:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports = BIT(PORT_A);
>> > + break;
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_C:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports = BIT(PORT_C);
>> > + break;
>> > + default:
>> > + case DL_DCS_PORT_A_AND_C:
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports =
>> > + BIT(PORT_A) | BIT(PORT_C);
>> > + break;
>> > + }
>> > + } else {
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.bl_ports = BIT(port);
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports = BIT(port);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + if (!dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->cabc_supported)
>> > + dev_priv->vbt.dsi.cabc_ports = 0;
>>
>> Would seem reasonable to not initalize it in the first place if it's not
>> supported.
>
> Agree. How about putting a check condition !cabc_supported
> before parsing dl_dcs_cabc_ports in switch case??
>
>>If you do a series of early returns starting with the bdb version
>> check, then !dual_link, then !cabc_supported, it might be easiest.
>
> But even if for !dual_link, still we need to fill newly added cabc_ports and bl_ports.
>
> Regards,
> Madhav
>
>>
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static void
>> > parse_mipi_config(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> > const struct bdb_header *bdb)
>> > @@ -738,9 +788,10 @@ parse_mipi_config(struct drm_i915_private
>> *dev_priv,
>> > const struct mipi_config *config;
>> > const struct mipi_pps_data *pps;
>> > int panel_type = dev_priv->vbt.panel_type;
>> > + enum port port;
>> >
>> > /* parse MIPI blocks only if LFP type is MIPI */
>> > - if (!intel_bios_is_dsi_present(dev_priv, NULL))
>> > + if (!intel_bios_is_dsi_present(dev_priv, &port))
>> > return;
>> >
>> > /* Initialize this to undefined indicating no generic MIPI support
>> > */ @@ -781,15 +832,7 @@ parse_mipi_config(struct drm_i915_private
>> *dev_priv,
>> > return;
>> > }
>> >
>> > - /*
>> > - * These fields are introduced from the VBT version 197 onwards,
>> > - * so making sure that these bits are set zero in the previous
>> > - * versions.
>> > - */
>> > - if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dual_link && bdb->version < 197) {
>> > - dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_cabc_ports = 0;
>> > - dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dl_dcs_backlight_ports = 0;
>> > - }
>> > + parse_dsi_backlight_ports(dev_priv, bdb->version, port);
>> >
>> > /* We have mandatory mipi config blocks. Initialize as generic panel
>> */
>> > dev_priv->vbt.dsi.panel_id = MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_PANEL_ID;
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
