From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To untangle the mess that is intel_ddi_post_disable() move the the bits needed by FDI into intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(). This way we can stop worrying about FDI in intel_ddi_post_disable(). Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c index e4d1d934231b..7187aea75697 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c @@ -2349,7 +2349,8 @@ void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, val &= ~FDI_RX_ENABLE; I915_WRITE(FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val); - intel_ddi_post_disable(encoder, old_crtc_state, old_conn_state); + intel_disable_ddi_buf(encoder); + intel_ddi_clk_disable(encoder); val = I915_READ(FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A)); val &= ~(FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_MASK | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_MASK); -- 2.13.6 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
