On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:53:05AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote: > Favor for_each_pipe() macro when looping through pipes. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c > index 24d781f..7efe3b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int display_crc_ctl_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private; > int i; Could also do the 'enum pipe pipe' change here. Looks like it shouldn't cause too much noise in the patch. > > - for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PIPES; i++) > + for_each_pipe(dev_priv, i) > seq_printf(m, "%c %s\n", pipe_name(i), > pipe_crc_source_name(dev_priv->pipe_crc[i].source)); > > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
