On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 12:00 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-10-06 11:45:59)
> > Lets not introduce BIT() macro requirement for UAPI for now.
> >
> > Fixes: 3fd3a6ffe279 ("drm/i915: Simplify i915_reg_read_ioctl")
> > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Yes, this is the simplest solution for now. I mistakenly thought we
> would be able to use BIT in uapi, but is not exported yet and the first
> one who does has the challene of conflicts. :|
>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the quick review, pushed the patch.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
