On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:23:50 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 16:36 +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
This is a prerequisite to unblock next steps.
v2: correct include order (Joonas)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
s/i915_fetch_uc_fw/intel_uc_fw_init/
Actually, "fetch_uc" function is not symmetrical to "fw_init" so
above rename will be misleading. I'm planning to add below init
function after we are done with all moves:
intel_uc_fw_init(struct intel_uc_fw *fw, enum intel_uc_fw_type type);
Given above, can I still keep your r-b?
Michal
And this is;
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Can you then re-submit these first four patches for CI results and I'll
merge them.
Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
