Re: [PATCH igt] tests/gem_workarounds: Skip write only registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:00:03PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> We have no means to check write only registers as
> this would need access through context image. For now we
> know that cnl has a one such register, 0xe5f0 which is used
> to set WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent:cnl. By inspecting
> the context image without and with workaround applied:
> 
> 0x0000a840: 0x0000e5f0 0xffff0800
> 0x0000a840: 0x0000e5f0 0xffff0820
> 
> we can conclude that the workaround setup is working right
> in this particular case.
> 
> Add a write only list and add register 0xe5f0 into this list.
> This is a temporary solution until a more capable context image
> checker emerges.
> 
> v2: add code comment about adhocness (Petri)
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/gem_workarounds.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/gem_workarounds.c b/tests/gem_workarounds.c
> index d6641bd5..5e30a7b8 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_workarounds.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_workarounds.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  
>  #include <fcntl.h>
>  
> +static int gen;
> +
>  enum operation {
>  	GPU_RESET,
>  	SUSPEND_RESUME,
> @@ -41,6 +43,21 @@ struct intel_wa_reg {
>  	uint32_t mask;
>  };
>  
> +static struct write_only_list {
> +	unsigned int gen;
> +	uint32_t addr;
> +} wo_list[] = {
> +	{ 10, 0xE5F0 } /* WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent:cnl */
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME: If you are contemplating adding stuff here
> +	 * consider this as a temporary solution. You need to
> +	 * manually check from context image that your workaround
> +	 * is having an effect. Consider creating a context image
> +	 * validator to act as a superior solution.
> +	 */
> +};

Excellent.

Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>




>  static struct intel_wa_reg *wa_regs;
>  static int num_wa_regs;
>  
> @@ -64,6 +81,21 @@ static void test_suspend_resume(void)
>  	igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>  }
>  
> +static bool write_only(const uint32_t addr)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wo_list); i++) {
> +		if (gen == wo_list[i].gen &&
> +		    addr == wo_list[i].addr) {
> +			igt_info("Skipping check for 0x%x due to write only\n", addr);
> +			return true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int workaround_fail_count(void)
>  {
>  	int i, fail_count = 0;
> @@ -85,6 +117,9 @@ static int workaround_fail_count(void)
>  			  wa_regs[i].addr, wa_regs[i].value, wa_regs[i].mask,
>  			  val, ok ? "OK" : "FAIL");
>  
> +		if (write_only(wa_regs[i].addr))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (!ok) {
>  			igt_warn("0x%05X\t0x%08X\t0x%08X\t0x%08X\t%s\n",
>  				 wa_regs[i].addr, wa_regs[i].value,
> @@ -124,7 +159,6 @@ igt_main
>  {
>  	igt_fixture {
>  		int device = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> -		const int gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(device));
>  		struct pci_device *pci_dev;
>  		FILE *file;
>  		char *line = NULL;
> @@ -133,6 +167,8 @@ igt_main
>  
>  		igt_require_gem(device);
>  
> +		gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(device));
> +
>  		pci_dev = intel_get_pci_device();
>  		igt_require(pci_dev);
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux