On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 09:40 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-09-19 13:43:41)
> > Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-09-11 09:41:34)
> > > If the caller says that he doesn't want to evict any other faulting
> > > vma, honour that flag. The logic was used in evict_something, but not
> > > the more specific evict_for_node, now being used as a preliminary probe
> > > since commit 606fec956c0e ("drm/i915: Prefer random replacement before
> > > eviction search").
> > >
> > > Fixes: 606fec956c0e ("drm/i915: Prefer random replacement before eviction search")
> > > Fixes: 821188778b9b ("drm/i915: Choose not to evict faultable objects from the GGTT")
> > > References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/174781/
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Any chance of getting review to this point?
>
> Any better suggestions for resolving the incompletes in CI? Is this good
> enough to land right now and then we can improve again with a happy CI?
Review provided for the CI/bxt relevant parts.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
