Re: [PATCH v10 2/9] drm/i915: Update GEM suspend/resume flows considering GuC and GEM fences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/27/2017 9:17 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:30:32 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This patch moves GuC suspend/resume handlers to corresponding GEM handlers
and orders them properly in the runtime and system suspend/resume flows.
i915_gem_restore_fences is GEM resumption task hence it is moved to
i915_gem_resume from i915_restore_state.

v2: Removed documentation of suspend/resume handlers as those are not
interfaces and are just hooks. (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c     |  7 -------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c     | 11 ++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |  2 --
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index d0a710d..174a7c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1698,8 +1698,6 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
     }
     mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-    intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
-
     intel_modeset_init_hw(dev);
    spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
@@ -2504,8 +2502,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
         return ret;
     }
-    intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
-
     intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev_priv);
    ret = 0;
@@ -2522,7 +2518,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
         DRM_ERROR("Runtime suspend failed, disabling it (%d)\n", ret);
         intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
-        intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
         i915_gem_runtime_resume(dev_priv);
         enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
@@ -2591,8 +2586,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
     if (intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))
         DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Unclaimed access during suspend, bios?\n");
-    intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
-
     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
         bxt_disable_dc9(dev_priv);
         bxt_display_core_init(dev_priv, true);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 59a88f2..11922af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2027,6 +2027,8 @@ int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
     struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
     int i;
+    intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+
     /*
      * Only called during RPM suspend. All users of the userfault_list
      * must be holding an RPM wakeref to ensure that this can not
@@ -2077,6 +2079,8 @@ void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
      */
     i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
     i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
+
+    intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
 }
static int i915_gem_object_create_mmap_offset(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) @@ -4551,8 +4555,6 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
     i915_gem_contexts_lost(dev_priv);
     mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-    intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
-
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work);
     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gt.retire_work);
@@ -4569,6 +4571,8 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
     if (WARN_ON(!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv)))
         i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
+    intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+
     /*
      * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
      * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
@@ -4607,13 +4611,14 @@ int i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
    mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
     i915_gem_restore_gtt_mappings(dev_priv);
+    i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
    /* As we didn't flush the kernel context before suspend, we cannot
      * guarantee that the context image is complete. So let's just reset
      * it and start again.
      */
     dev_priv->gt.resume(dev_priv);
-

I would leave that empty line
Sure. Will update.

+    intel_guc_resume(dev_priv);
     mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
    return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c
index 5c86925a..8f3aa4d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c
@@ -108,8 +108,6 @@ int i915_restore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
    mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
-    i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
-

And this move of i915_gem_restore_fences() can likely be in separate patch

Michal
Ok. Will create separate patch.

     if (IS_GEN4(dev_priv))
         pci_write_config_word(pdev, GCDGMBUS,
                       dev_priv->regfile.saveGCDGMBUS);

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux