Shouldn't we filter them out per platform? Anyways it is good for me Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 08:53:42PM +0000, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Looks like we were missing them. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 026fa54..64a4105 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -11336,6 +11336,18 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.ctrl1); > PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1); > PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.cfgcr2); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.cfgcr0); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.ebb0); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.ebb4); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll0); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll1); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll2); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll3); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll6); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll8); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll9); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pll10); > + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dpll_hw_state.pcsdw12); > > PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dsi_pll.ctrl); > PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(dsi_pll.div); > -- > 2.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
