On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:50 +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Learned a lot. :) > > GEM_BUG_ON is new to me since it wasn't there at the beginning of > GVT-g upstream. It showed up later. So I left a lot of WARN_ON in the > code and some of them should be GEM_BUG_ON now. > > Now I can figure out those differences. We can discuss with our QA to > see if they would like to enable I915_GEM_DEBUG and then we can move > to GEM_BUG_ON also, or maybe we can have a dedicated GVT_BUG_ON. :) > Thank you so much. Have a great weekend. GVT_BUG_ON is probably the way to go :) Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
