On 21/09/2017 14:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
The per-context and per-batch workaround buffers are optional, yet we
tell the GPU to execute them even if they contain no instructions. Doing
so incurs the dispatch latency, which we can avoid if we don't ask the
GPU to execute the no-op buffers. Allow ourselves to skip setup of empty
buffer, and then to only enable non-empty buffers in the context image.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 86fed9f1f1ae..297c9c1564e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1265,7 +1265,8 @@ static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- batch_ptr = wa_bb_fn[i](engine, batch_ptr);
+ if (wa_bb_fn[i])
+ batch_ptr = wa_bb_fn[i](engine, batch_ptr);
wa_bb[i]->size = batch_ptr - (batch + wa_bb[i]->offset);
}
@@ -1994,13 +1995,12 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
CTX_REG(regs, CTX_SECOND_BB_HEAD_L, RING_SBBADDR(base), 0);
CTX_REG(regs, CTX_SECOND_BB_STATE, RING_SBBSTATE(base), 0);
if (rcs) {
- CTX_REG(regs, CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR, RING_BB_PER_CTX_PTR(base), 0);
+ struct i915_ctx_workarounds *wa_ctx = &engine->wa_ctx;
+
CTX_REG(regs, CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX, RING_INDIRECT_CTX(base), 0);
CTX_REG(regs, CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET,
RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base), 0);
-
- if (engine->wa_ctx.vma) {
- struct i915_ctx_workarounds *wa_ctx = &engine->wa_ctx;
+ if (wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size) {
u32 ggtt_offset = i915_ggtt_offset(wa_ctx->vma);
regs[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX + 1] =
@@ -2009,6 +2009,11 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
regs[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET + 1] =
intel_lr_indirect_ctx_offset(engine) << 6;
+ }
+
+ CTX_REG(regs, CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR, RING_BB_PER_CTX_PTR(base), 0);
+ if (wa_ctx->per_ctx.size) {
+ u32 ggtt_offset = i915_ggtt_offset(wa_ctx->vma);
regs[CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR + 1] =
(ggtt_offset + wa_ctx->per_ctx.offset) | 0x01;
Looks OK. Does it make sense to fetch the ggtt offset only once ("if
(size || size) ggtt_offset = ...")? Meh.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
