On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 21:12:25 +0200, Chris Wilson
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2017-09-18 19:55:07)
Our global struct with params is named exactly the same way
as new preferred name for the drm_i915_private function parameter.
To avoid such name reuse lets use different name for the global.
v4: introduction of mkwrite()
Credits-to: Coccinelle
@@
identifier n;
expression e;
@@
(
- i915.n = e;
+ i915_modparams_mkwrite()->n = e;
|
- i915.n++;
+ i915_modparams_mkwrite()->n++;
|
- i915.n--;
+ i915_modparams_mkwrite()->n--;
|
- i915.n
+ i915_modparams.n
)
Did this also catch s/&i915&i915_modparams/?
No, but since it was in macro definition, it was unaccessible to
Coccinelle anyway
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx