On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To untangle the mess that is intel_ddi_post_disable() move the the bits > needed by FDI into intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(). This way we can stop > worrying about FDI in intel_ddi_post_disable(). > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > index 2dbbd47665de..bbb08c6f0bba 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > @@ -2321,7 +2321,8 @@ void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > val &= ~FDI_RX_ENABLE; > I915_WRITE(FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val); > > - intel_ddi_post_disable(encoder, old_crtc_state, old_conn_state); > + intel_disable_ddi_buf(encoder); > + intel_ddi_clk_disable(encoder); > > val = I915_READ(FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A)); > val &= ~(FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_MASK | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_MASK); -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
