On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 12:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-09-04 07:50:38)
> > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:57 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Sparse enforces that GFP flags are only manipulated inside gfp_t locals.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4d470f7359c4 ("drm/i915: Avoid undefined behaviour of "u32 >> 32"")
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Isn't Fixes: bit much for sparse warning?
>
> Impact: None ?
Well, "Impact: Cosmetic" would be more truthful but complex.
"Backport: None" ?
Could also take the value that is currently causing grief in the Cc:
stable line;
"Backport: v4.8+"
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
