On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan
<dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> intel_dp_can_mst() performs these checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 644463ba313e..a4465b46bb27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3845,12 +3845,6 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static void
> intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> - if (!i915.enable_dp_mst)
> - return;
> -
> - if (!intel_dp->can_mst)
> - return;
> -
By dropping these returns, we will now always get DRM_DEBUG_KMS output
on whether the sink is MST capable, even if the i915.enable_dp_mst
param is false - maybe drop these from intel_dp_can_mst instead?
> intel_dp->is_mst = intel_dp_can_mst(intel_dp);
>
> if (intel_dp->is_mst)
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
James Ausmus
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
