Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-09-13 13:18:19)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This reduces the cost of the software engine busyness tracking
> to a single no-op instruction when there are no listeners.
>
> v2: Rebase and some comments.
> v3: Rebase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 17 ++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index 3c0c5d0549b3..d734879e67ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -460,11 +460,17 @@ static void i915_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> GEM_BUG_ON(sample >= I915_PMU_SAMPLE_BITS);
> GEM_BUG_ON(engine->pmu.enable_count[sample] == ~0);
> if (engine->pmu.enable_count[sample]++ == 0) {
> + /*
> + * Enable engine busy stats tracking if needed or
> + * alternatively cancel the scheduled disabling of the
> + * same.
> + */
> if (engine_needs_busy_stats(engine) &&
> !engine->pmu.busy_stats) {
> - engine->pmu.busy_stats =
> - intel_enable_engine_stats(engine) == 0;
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!engine->pmu.busy_stats);
> + engine->pmu.busy_stats = true;
> + if (!cancel_delayed_work(&engine->pmu.disable_busy_stats))
> + queue_work(i915->wq,
> + &engine->pmu.enable_busy_stats);
The only users of i915->wq are supposed to be dependent on struct_mutex,
it is limited to a single job under the presumption that each worker
would be serialised by that mutex.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
