Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/guc: Cleanup adding GuC work items

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-09-14 09:32:15)
> We can just operate on the wq_tail directly (in the process descriptor).
> This allows us to remove the duplicated tail from the client. While I'm
> here let's also remove the constants kept in the client and document our
> locking requirements. This causes a small change in one of GuC debugfs
> files. We're no longer reporting constant values (which I don't think
> is a problem), but we're also no longer reporting the tail (does anyone
> care?).
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux