On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 16:24 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:25PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() fails if there are dpcd failures, so
> > there's no need to try that again in _check_mst_status()
>
> That commit message somehow doesn't seem to match this patch. You're not
> removing anything from _check_mst_status() here.
>
You are right, I meant to write "there's no need to call
_check_mst_status to try dpcd reads again"
Is that good?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 98e7b96ca826..b3d95cb7546b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -6224,12 +6224,16 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[i];
> > int ret;
> > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp;
> >
> > - if (!intel_dig_port || !intel_dig_port->dp.can_mst)
> > + if (!intel_dig_port || !intel_dp->can_mst)
> > continue;
> >
> > - ret = drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
> > - if (ret)
> > - intel_dp_check_mst_status(&intel_dig_port->dp);
> > + ret = drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dp->mst_mgr);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> > + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_dp->is_mst);
> > + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(dev);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.11.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
