On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2017-09-12 16:36:57) >> > -module_param_named(modeset, i915.modeset, int, 0400); >> > +module_param_named(modeset, i915_params.modeset, int, 0400); > > We could clear the bulk of this patch > > #define i915_param_named(name, T, perm) module_param_named(name, i915.##name, T, perm) > #define i915_param_named_unsafe(name, T, perm) module_param_named_unsafe(name, i915.##name, T, perm) > > as step 1. That's not unreasonable, as it's all stowed away in one file. Perhaps throw in MODULE_PARM_DESC to the same macro? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
