Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-09-11 13:03:28) > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:55:58AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > - igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang); > > - unplug(&cork); /* only now submit our batches */ > > - igt_assert_eq(__gem_wait(fd, obj[1].handle, -1), 0); > > + fence = execbuf.rsvd2 >> 32; > > + igt_assert(fence != -1); > > + > > + igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang); /* wedged, with an unready batch */ > > + sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1); /* only now submit our batches */ > > + > > + igt_assert_eq(__gem_wait(fd, obj.handle, -1), 0); > > Is there any reason for rolling our own __gem_wait here? :> > (not a part of this patch... just curious) A modern invention. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
