Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Introduce INTEL_GEN_MASK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 12:39 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2017, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Split INTEL_GEN_MASK out of IS_GEN macro, and make it usable
> > within static declarations (unlike combound statements).
> > 
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 22 ++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 63ca2ffcafef..c3f9d7d7b146 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2873,23 +2873,21 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  #define INTEL_REVID(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->drm.pdev->revision)
> >  
> >  #define GEN_FOREVER (0)
> > +
> > +#define INTEL_GEN_MASK(s, e) ( \
> > +        BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!__builtin_constant_p(s)) + \
> > +        BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!__builtin_constant_p(e)) + \
> > +        GENMASK((e) != GEN_FOREVER ? (e) - 1 : BITS_PER_LONG - 1, \
> > +	        (s) != GEN_FOREVER ? (s) - 1 : 0) \
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> but I'd really like a patch on top to remove the -1 from here and
> info->gen_mask.

I'll add it.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux