On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 20:57 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-09-06 20:51:37) > > Instead of limiting the range with this unusual GEN_RANGE > > let's assume following platforms would use same scheme > > unless stated otherwise. > > No. This is uabi that should indeed be checked before exposed and not > assumed that unprivileged access to a register of yesterday is still > safe tommorrow. hm... makes sense.. can we at least move to INTEL_GEN >= 4 && INTEL_GEN <= 10 or some flag on platform definition? I really don't like GEN_RANGE... > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
