Hello,
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Can't you use cancel[_delayed]_work_sync()?
>
> We then need a loop like:
>
> do {
> if (cancel_delayed_work_sync(wrk))
> do_work(wrk);
> else
> break;
> } while (1);
>
> We do want the flush semantics.
I see. Heh, I don't know. One thing you can try to do is putting
them on a separate workqueue and use drain_workqueue() or
destroy_workqueue() on it. Those functions expect there to be some
requeueing but warns if there are too much (non configurable now but
we can add if necessary).
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
