From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Make gmbus_lock_ops and proxy_lock_ops static to appease sparse
intel_i2c.c:652:34: warning: symbol 'gmbus_lock_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
intel_sdvo.c:2981:34: warning: symbol 'proxy_lock_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Fixes: a85066840d29 ("drm/i915: Rework sdvo proxy i2c locking")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
index 6698826954e1..eb5827110d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static void gmbus_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
}
-const struct i2c_lock_operations gmbus_lock_ops = {
+static const struct i2c_lock_operations gmbus_lock_ops = {
.lock_bus = gmbus_lock_bus,
.trylock_bus = gmbus_trylock_bus,
.unlock_bus = gmbus_unlock_bus,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
index 9509a18eb00d..7437944b388f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ static void proxy_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
sdvo->i2c->lock_ops->unlock_bus(sdvo->i2c, flags);
}
-const struct i2c_lock_operations proxy_lock_ops = {
+static const struct i2c_lock_operations proxy_lock_ops = {
.lock_bus = proxy_lock_bus,
.trylock_bus = proxy_trylock_bus,
.unlock_bus = proxy_unlock_bus,
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
