Re: [RFCv6 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also I should send a register diff at that time (RFC -> PATCH). Suppose these two patches should keep the used PPAT registers unchanged like before.


On 08/31/17 13:22, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
Thanks for the test! Sorry I didn't have an CNL on my hand.

This is only RFC now. after collecting all the comments, I will start full test. :)

Thanks,
Zhi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodrigo Vivi [mailto:rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:15 AM
To: Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Widawsky, Benjamin <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  [RFCv6 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Vivi:
     Thanks for the reply! The register are written in ppat->update_hw() now.
oh, I saw now...
I hadden noticed that interation.

But something seems really odd yet...
My CNL with these 2 patches applied hangs on any execution...


+static void cnl_private_pat_update_hw(struct drm_i915_private
+*dev_priv) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
+       int i;
+
+       for_each_set_bit(i, ppat->dirty, ppat->max_entries) {
+               I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(i), ppat->entries[i].value);
+               clear_bit(i, ppat->dirty);
+       }
+}
+
+static void bdw_private_pat_update_hw(struct drm_i915_private
+*dev_priv) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
+       u64 pat = 0;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ppat->max_entries; i++)
+               pat |= GEN8_PPAT(i, ppat->entries[i].value);
+
+       bitmap_clear(ppat->dirty, 0, ppat->max_entries);
+
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, lower_32_bits(pat));
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, upper_32_bits(pat)); }

On 08/31/17 06:00, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 02:14 +0800, Zhi Wang wrote:
The private PAT management is to support PPAT entry manipulation.
Two APIs are introduced for dynamically managing PPAT entries:
intel_ppat_get and intel_ppat_put.

intel_ppat_get will search for an existing PPAT entry which
perfectly matches the required PPAT value. If not, it will try to
allocate or return a partially matched PPAT entry if there is any
available PPAT indexes or not.

intel_ppat_put will put back the PPAT entry which comes from
intel_ppat_get. If it's dynamically allocated, the reference count
will be decreased. If the reference count turns into zero, the PPAT
index is freed again.

Besides, another two callbacks are introduced to support the private
PAT management framework. One is ppat->update_hw(), which writes the
PPAT configurations in ppat->entries into HW. Another one is
ppat->match, which will return a score to show how two PPAT values
match with each other.

v6:

- Address all comments from Chris:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg136850.html

- Address all comments from Joonas:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg136845.html

v5:

- Add check and warnnings for those platforms which don't have PPAT.

v3:

- Introduce dirty bitmap for PPAT registers. (Chris)
- Change the name of the pointer "dev_priv" to "i915". (Chris)
- intel_ppat_{get, put} returns/takes a const intel_ppat_entry *.
(Chris)

v2:

- API re-design. (Chris)

Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |   2 +
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 273
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h |  36 +++++
   3 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 7587ef5..5ffde10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2312,6 +2312,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
         DECLARE_HASHTABLE(mm_structs, 7);
         struct mutex mm_lock;
   +     struct intel_ppat ppat;
+
         /* Kernel Modesetting */
         struct intel_crtc *plane_to_crtc_mapping[I915_MAX_PIPES];
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index b74fa9d..3106142 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -2816,41 +2816,200 @@ static int ggtt_probe_common(struct
i915_ggtt *ggtt, u64 size)
         return 0;
   }
   -static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
+static struct intel_ppat_entry *
+__alloc_ppat_entry(struct intel_ppat *ppat, unsigned int index, u8
value)
   {
+       struct intel_ppat_entry *entry = &ppat->entries[index];
+
+       GEM_BUG_ON(index >= ppat->max_entries);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(index, ppat->used));
+
+       entry->ppat = ppat;
+       entry->value = value;
+       kref_init(&entry->ref);
+       set_bit(index, ppat->used);
+       set_bit(index, ppat->dirty);
+
+       return entry;
+}
+
+static void __free_ppat_entry(struct intel_ppat_entry *entry) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = entry->ppat;
+       unsigned int index = entry - ppat->entries;
+
+       GEM_BUG_ON(index >= ppat->max_entries);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(index, ppat->used));
+
+       entry->value = ppat->clear_value;
+       clear_bit(index, ppat->used);
+       set_bit(index, ppat->dirty); }
+
+/**
+ * intel_ppat_get - get a usable PPAT entry
+ * @i915: i915 device instance
+ * @value: the PPAT value required by the caller
+ *
+ * The function tries to search if there is an existing PPAT entry
+which
+ * matches with the required value. If perfectly matched, the
+existing
PPAT
+ * entry will be used. If only partially matched, it will try to
+ check
if
+ * there is any available PPAT index. If yes, it will allocate a
+ new
PPAT
+ * index for the required entry and update the HW. If not, the
+partially
+ * matched entry will be used.
+ */
+const struct intel_ppat_entry *
+intel_ppat_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 value) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &i915->ppat;
+       struct intel_ppat_entry *entry;
+       unsigned int scanned, best_score;
+       int i;
+
+       GEM_BUG_ON(!ppat->max_entries);
+
+       scanned = best_score = 0;
+
+       for_each_set_bit(i, ppat->used, ppat->max_entries) {
+               unsigned int score;
+
+               entry = &ppat->entries[i];
+               score = ppat->match(entry->value, value);
+               if (score > best_score) {
+                       if (score == INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH) {
+                               kref_get(&entry->ref);
+                               return entry;
+                       }
+                       best_score = score;
+               }
+               scanned++;
+       }
+
+       if (scanned == ppat->max_entries) {
+               if (!best_score)
+                       return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
+
+               kref_get(&entry->ref);
+               return entry;
+       }
+
+       i = find_first_zero_bit(ppat->used, ppat->max_entries);
+       entry = __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, i, value);
+       ppat->update_hw(i915);
+       return entry;
+}
+
+static void release_ppat(struct kref *kref) {
+       struct intel_ppat_entry *entry =
+               container_of(kref, struct intel_ppat_entry, ref);
+       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = entry->ppat->i915;
+
+       __free_ppat_entry(entry);
+       entry->ppat->update_hw(i915); }
+
+/**
+ * intel_ppat_put - put back the PPAT entry got from
+intel_ppat_get()
+ * @entry: an intel PPAT entry
+ *
+ * Put back the PPAT entry got from intel_ppat_get(). If the PPAT
+index
of the
+ * entry is dynamically allocated, its reference count will be
decreased. Once
+ * the reference count becomes into zero, the PPAT index becomes
+ free
again.
+ */
+void intel_ppat_put(const struct intel_ppat_entry *entry) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = entry->ppat;
+       unsigned int index = entry - ppat->entries;
+
+       GEM_BUG_ON(!ppat->max_entries);
+
+       kref_put(&ppat->entries[index].ref, release_ppat); }
+
+static void cnl_private_pat_update_hw(struct drm_i915_private
+*dev_priv) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
+       int i;
+
+       for_each_set_bit(i, ppat->dirty, ppat->max_entries) {
+               I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(i), ppat->entries[i].value);
+               clear_bit(i, ppat->dirty);
+       }
+}
+
+static void bdw_private_pat_update_hw(struct drm_i915_private
+*dev_priv) {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
+       u64 pat = 0;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ppat->max_entries; i++)
+               pat |= GEN8_PPAT(i, ppat->entries[i].value);
+
+       bitmap_clear(ppat->dirty, 0, ppat->max_entries);
+
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, lower_32_bits(pat));
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, upper_32_bits(pat)); }
+
+static unsigned int bdw_private_pat_match(u8 src, u8 dst) {
+       unsigned int score = 0;
+
+       /* Cache attribute has to be matched. */
+       if (GEN8_PPAT_GET_CA(src) != GEN8_PPAT_GET_CA(dst))
+               return 0;
+
+       if (GEN8_PPAT_GET_TC(src) == GEN8_PPAT_GET_TC(dst))
+               score += 2;
+
+       if(GEN8_PPAT_GET_AGE(src) == GEN8_PPAT_GET_AGE(dst))
+               score += 1;
+
+       if (score == 3)
+               return INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH;
+
+       return score;
+}
+
+static unsigned int chv_private_pat_match(u8 src, u8 dst) {
+       return (CHV_PPAT_GET_SNOOP(src) == CHV_PPAT_GET_SNOOP(dst)) ?
+               INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH : 0; }
+
+static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_ppat *ppat) {
+       ppat->max_entries = 8;
+       ppat->update_hw = cnl_private_pat_update_hw;
+       ppat->match = bdw_private_pat_match;
+       ppat->clear_value = GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3);
+
         /* XXX: spec is unclear if this is still needed for CNL+ */
-       if (!USES_PPGTT(dev_priv)) {
-               I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_UC);
+       if (!USES_PPGTT(ppat->i915)) {
+               __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX,
GEN8_PPAT_UC);
                 return;
         }
   -     I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(0), GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(1), GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(2), GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(3), GEN8_PPAT_UC);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(4), GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0));
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(5), GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(1));
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(6), GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(2));
-       I915_WRITE(GEN10_PAT_INDEX(7), GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3));

Gen8 allocation style doesn't work on CNL.
I don't see where all these registers would be getting properly written.

+       /* See gen8_pte_encode() for the mapping from cache-level to
+ PPAT
*/
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX, GEN8_PPAT_WB
+ |
GEN8_PPAT_LLC);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_DISPLAY_ELLC_INDEX,
+ GEN8_PPAT_WT |
GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_UNCACHED_INDEX, GEN8_PPAT_UC);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_INDEX,
+ GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0));
   }
     /* The GGTT and PPGTT need a private PPAT setup in order to
handle cacheability
    * bits. When using advanced contexts each context stores its own
PAT, but
    * writing this data shouldn't be harmful even in those cases. */
-static void bdw_setup_private_ppat(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
+static void bdw_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_ppat *ppat)
   {
-       u64 pat;
+       ppat->max_entries = 8;
+       ppat->update_hw = bdw_private_pat_update_hw;
+       ppat->match = bdw_private_pat_match;
+       ppat->clear_value = GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3);
   -     pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC)     | /* for
normal objects, no eLLC */
-             GEN8_PPAT(1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for
something pointing to ptes? */
-             GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for
scanout with eLLC */
-             GEN8_PPAT(3, GEN8_PPAT_UC)                     | /*
Uncached objects, mostly for scanout */
-             GEN8_PPAT(4, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0)) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(5, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(1)) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(6, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(2)) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(7, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC |
GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3));
-
-       if (!USES_PPGTT(dev_priv))
+       if (!USES_PPGTT(ppat->i915)) {
                 /* Spec: "For GGTT, there is NO pat_sel[2:0] from
the entry,
                  * so RTL will always use the value corresponding to
                  * pat_sel = 000".
@@ -2864,17 +3023,26 @@ static void bdw_setup_private_ppat(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                  * So we can still hold onto all our assumptions wrt cpu
                  * clflushing on LLC machines.
                  */
-               pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, GEN8_PPAT_UC);
+               __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX,
GEN8_PPAT_UC);
+               return;
+       }
   -     /* XXX: spec defines this as 2 distinct registers. It's unclear
if a 64b
-        * write would work. */
-       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, pat);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, pat >> 32);
+       /* See gen8_pte_encode() for the mapping from cache-level to
+ PPAT
*/
+       /* for normal objects, no eLLC */
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX, GEN8_PPAT_WB
+ |
GEN8_PPAT_LLC);
+       /* for scanout with eLLC */
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_DISPLAY_ELLC_INDEX,
+ GEN8_PPAT_WT |
GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
+       /* Uncached objects, mostly for scanout */
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_UNCACHED_INDEX, GEN8_PPAT_UC);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_INDEX, GEN8_PPAT_WB |
GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0));
   }
   -static void chv_setup_private_ppat(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
+static void chv_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_ppat *ppat)
   {
-       u64 pat;
+       ppat->max_entries = 8;
+       ppat->update_hw = bdw_private_pat_update_hw;
+       ppat->match = chv_private_pat_match;
+       ppat->clear_value = CHV_PPAT_SNOOP;
         /*
          * Map WB on BDW to snooped on CHV.
@@ -2894,17 +3062,12 @@ static void chv_setup_private_ppat(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
          * Which means we must set the snoop bit in PAT entry 0
          * in order to keep the global status page working.
          */
-       pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(1, 0) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(2, 0) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(3, 0) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(4, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(5, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(6, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP) |
-             GEN8_PPAT(7, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP);
   -     I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, pat);
-       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, pat >> 32);
+       /* See gen8_pte_encode() for the mapping from cache-level to
+ PPAT
*/
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_DISPLAY_ELLC_INDEX, 0);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_UNCACHED_INDEX, 0);
+       __alloc_ppat_entry(ppat, PPAT_CACHED_INDEX, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP);
   }
     static void gen6_gmch_remove(struct i915_address_space *vm) @@
-2917,12 +3080,27 @@ static void gen6_gmch_remove(struct
i915_address_space *vm)
     static void setup_private_pat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
   {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
+       int i;
+
+       ppat->i915 = dev_priv;
+
         if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
-               cnl_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
+               cnl_setup_private_ppat(ppat);
         else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
-               chv_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
+               chv_setup_private_ppat(ppat);
         else
-               bdw_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
+               bdw_setup_private_ppat(ppat);
+
+       GEM_BUG_ON(ppat->max_entries > INTEL_MAX_PPAT_ENTRIES);
+
+       for_each_clear_bit(i, ppat->used, ppat->max_entries) {
+               ppat->entries[i].value = ppat->clear_value;
+               ppat->entries[i].ppat = ppat;
+               set_bit(i, ppat->dirty);
+       }
+
+       ppat->update_hw(dev_priv);
   }
     static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt) @@ -3236,13
+3414,10 @@ void i915_gem_restore_gtt_mappings(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
         ggtt->base.closed = false;
         if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
-               if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
-                       cnl_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
-               else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
-                       chv_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
-               else
-                       bdw_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
+               struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
   +             bitmap_set(ppat->dirty, 0, ppat->max_entries);
+               dev_priv->ppat.update_hw(dev_priv);
                 return;
         }
   diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
index b4e3aa7..e10ca89 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ typedef u64 gen8_ppgtt_pml4e_t;
   #define GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE               (0<<2)
   #define GEN8_PPAT(i, x)                       ((u64)(x) << ((i) * 8))
   +#define GEN8_PPAT_GET_CA(x) ((x) & 3)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_GET_TC(x) ((x) & (3 << 2)) #define
+GEN8_PPAT_GET_AGE(x) ((x) & (3 << 4)) #define CHV_PPAT_GET_SNOOP(x)
+((x) & (1 << 6))
+
   struct sg_table;
     struct intel_rotation_info {
@@ -536,6 +541,37 @@ i915_vm_to_ggtt(struct i915_address_space *vm)
         return container_of(vm, struct i915_ggtt, base);
   }
   +#define INTEL_MAX_PPAT_ENTRIES 8
+#define INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH (~0U)
+
+struct intel_ppat;
+
+struct intel_ppat_entry {
+       struct intel_ppat *ppat;
+       struct kref ref;
+       u8 value;
+};
+
+struct intel_ppat {
+       struct intel_ppat_entry entries[INTEL_MAX_PPAT_ENTRIES];
+       DECLARE_BITMAP(used, INTEL_MAX_PPAT_ENTRIES);
+       DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty, INTEL_MAX_PPAT_ENTRIES);
+       unsigned int max_entries;
+       u8 clear_value;
+       /*
+        * Return a score to show how two PPAT values match,
+        * a INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH indicates a perfect match
+        */
+       unsigned int (*match)(u8 src, u8 dst);
+       void (*update_hw)(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
+
+       struct drm_i915_private *i915; };
+
+const struct intel_ppat_entry *
+intel_ppat_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 value); void
+intel_ppat_put(const struct intel_ppat_entry *entry);
+
   int i915_gem_init_aliasing_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
   void i915_gem_fini_aliasing_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915);


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux