On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > On 30/08/17 10:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Also dapc is not a good testcase name, needs some proper prefixing. > > > Reminds me perf.c should probably be renamed too. > What would be an appropriate name? intel_perf.c? I think at least a common prefix for all the perf related stuff would be good. Atm we don't have a consistent rule for prefixing intel-specific tests, so perf and perf_dapc sound ok to me. If you want, add an intel_ prefix for fun. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
