Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for lib/core: Use igt_info instead of printf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 01:50:12PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: lib/core: Use igt_info instead of printf
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/29210/
> State : success


For anyone else wondering, the difference with this series can be seen
comparing e.g. these results from the Fi.CI.IGT results:

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_2995/shard-kbl3/igt@pm_rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

vs

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_86/shard-kbl1/igt@pm_rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux