Quoting Dan Carpenter (2017-08-18 08:07:00)
> There are some potential integer overflows here on 64 bit systems.
>
> The condition "if (nfences > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(*fences))" can only be
> true on 32 bit systems, it's a no-op on 64 bit, so let's ignore the
> check for now and look a couple lines after:
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, user, nfences * 2 * sizeof(u32)))
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> "nfences" is an unsigned int, so if we set it to UINT_MAX and multiply
> by two, it's going to have an integer overflow. The multiplication by
> sizeof(u32) is OK because that gets type promoted to size_t. This patch
> changes the access_ok() check to use sizeof(*user) which fixes the
> integer overflow and is also more readable.
>
> The "args->buffer_count" variable is an unsigned int as well so it could
> overflow if it's set to UINT_MAX when we do:
>
> exec2_list = kvmalloc_array(args->buffer_count + 1, sz,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Originally, those two integer overflow checks were against UINT_MAX
> instead of SIZE_MAX and this patch changes them back.
>
> Fixes: 2889caa92321 ("drm/i915: Eliminate lots of iterations over the execobjects array")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Use sizeof(*users)
Please do consider my alternative.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
