Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix integer overflow tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:50:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:37:00PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:23:10AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > There are some potential integer overflows here on 64 bit systems.
> > > 
> > > The condition "if (nfences > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(*fences))" can only be
> > > true on 32 bit systems, it's a no-op on 64 bit, so let's ignore the
> > > check for now and look a couple lines after:
> > > 
> > > 	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, user, nfences * 2 * sizeof(u32)))
> > >                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > "nfences" is an unsigned int, so if we set it to UINT_MAX and multiply
> > > by two, it's going to have an integer overflow.  
> > 
> > AFAICS it wouldn't overflow due the promotion to unsigned long
> > by '* sizeof(u32)'.
> > 
> 
> It first multplies "nfences * 2" as unsigned int, then it type promotes
> to size_t and multiplies by sizeof().  Only the first multiplication has
> an integer overflow bug.

Err, that's correct. Sorry for the noise.

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux