There is probably one more place where we want this change, but I will
try to cover that in my 4:2:0 for lspcon patch set.
Meanwhile, please feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards
Shashank
On 8/16/2017 8:34 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
When LSPCON support was extended to CNL
one part was missed on lspcon_init.
So, instead of adding check per platform on lspcon_init
let's use HAS_LSPCON that is already there for that
purpose.
Fixes: ff15947e0f02 ("drm/i915/cnl: LSPCON support is gen9+")
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
index 5abef482eacf..beb9baaf2f2e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lspcon.c
@@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ bool lspcon_init(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
- if (!IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) {
- DRM_ERROR("LSPCON is supported on GEN9 only\n");
+ if (!HAS_LSPCON(dev_priv)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("LSPCON is not supported on this platform\n");
return false;
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
