These patches depend on the RFC patches enabling i915 PMU from Tvrtko: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/27488/ Thus, CI failure to build them is expected. I think that my patches should be squeashed in Tvrtko's one actually. The first patch simply reorders functions and does nothing now comparing to Tvrtko's patches. Next patches adds fixes according to PMU API comments and clarifications from PMU aware engineers. Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Dmitry Rogozhkin (2): drm/i915/pmu: reorder function to suite next patch drm/i915/pmu: serve global events and support perf stat drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
