skl,kbl and cnl need to keep pg1 active unconditionally. We already do this but the workaround name was missing, add it. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index e77e84a6fd2f..bc5bd86d663f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -2566,6 +2566,7 @@ static void skl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock); well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_1); + /* WaKeepPG1ActiveDueToDMCIssue:skl,kbl */ intel_power_well_enable(dev_priv, well); well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_MISC_IO); @@ -2741,6 +2742,7 @@ static void cnl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume */ mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock); well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_1); + /* WaKeepPG1ActiveDueToDMCIssue:cnl */ intel_power_well_enable(dev_priv, well); mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock); -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
