On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Revert to a normal comment, as the enum isn't properly documented > anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 56df86ef5a4d..3b42ba9fa473 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg) > #define DP_SSS_RESET(pipe) _DP_SSS(0x2, (pipe)) > #define DP_SSS_PWR_GATE(pipe) _DP_SSS(0x3, (pipe)) > > -/** > +/* > * i915_power_well_id: this part would definitely deserve a space on the doc, but in the current way it is I agree that it better to remove. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > * > * Platform specific IDs used to look up power wells and - except for custom > -- > 2.11.0 > -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
