Re: [PATCH i-g-t] pm_rps: Extended testcases with checking PMINTRMSK register value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Katarzyna Dec (2017-08-10 14:06:15)
> In addition to checking whether the frequency is in correct range
> for certain scenario, we can also verify whether PM interrupts are
> masked correctly.

What does correctly mean? It was a recommendation not a requirement.

You are checking internal kernel implementation details, just add the
check to our runtime suspend that we have applied the mask (which is a
reasonable check as the rps idling is decoupled from the rps suspend).
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux