We currently assume port A is connected to a DP sink when VBT is absent, instead assume it is connected to an eDP sink, which seems like a more common configuration. Although I don't have data to back this up, it is still just as valid as asumming port A is not eDP. This reverts to the behavior before a98d9c1 ("drm/i915/ddi: Rely on VBT DDI port info for eDP detection") except only when there is no VBT. Knowing whether a panel is eDP or not from the panel itself would have been nicer, but I cannot find any DPCD registers that provide this reliably.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Is this patch trying to fix a specific bug? Where do you plan to use supports_edp flag?
I guess I am trying to understand the need for this in the vbt missing defaults and what this patch is trying to solve here.
Manasi
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
index 82b144c..89a405e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
@@ -1403,6 +1403,7 @@ init_vbt_missing_defaults(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
info->supports_dvi = (port != PORT_A && port != PORT_E);
info->supports_hdmi = info->supports_dvi;
info->supports_dp = (port != PORT_E);
+ info->supports_edp = (port == PORT_A);
}
}
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
