This is already tested in kms_busy, and without cs flips there's no point in doing those tests any more. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/kms_flip.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c index ede5fd2ba9c5..ea860e191a67 100644 --- a/tests/kms_flip.c +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c @@ -755,13 +755,8 @@ static unsigned int run_test_step(struct test_output *o) if (o->flags & TEST_MODESET) igt_assert(set_mode(o, o->fb_ids[o->current_fb_id], 0, 0) == 0); - if (o->flags & TEST_DPMS) { - if (spin_rcs) - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin_rcs, NSEC_PER_SEC); - if (spin_bcs) - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin_bcs, NSEC_PER_SEC); + if (o->flags & TEST_DPMS) set_dpms(o, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON); - } if (o->flags & TEST_VBLANK_RACE) { struct vblank_reply reply; @@ -1592,14 +1587,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) "plain-flip-fb-recreate" }, { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_RMFB | TEST_MODESET , "flip-vs-rmfb" }, { 20, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS | TEST_EINVAL | TEST_BASIC, "flip-vs-dpms" }, - { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS, "blt-flip-vs-dpms" }, - { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS, "render-flip-vs-dpms" }, { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_PAN, "flip-vs-panning" }, { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_PAN | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS, "blt-flip-vs-panning" }, { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_PAN | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS, "render-flip-vs-panning" }, { 20, TEST_FLIP | TEST_MODESET | TEST_EINVAL | TEST_BASIC, "flip-vs-modeset" }, - { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_MODESET | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS, "blt-flip-vs-modeset" }, - { 60, TEST_FLIP | TEST_MODESET | TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS, "render-flip-vs-modeset" }, { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK_EXPIRED_SEQ, "flip-vs-expired-vblank" }, -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx