Re: [PATCH igt 1/2] lib: Add hooks for enabling ftrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-08-08 13:54:46)
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 12:27:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> *snip*
> 
> > +#define BIT(x) (1ul << (x))
> > +
> > +/* Only a single tracer in the kernel, so we can use a singleton */
> > +struct igt_ftrace {
> > +     int dir;
> > +
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +#define PID_SET BIT(0)
> > +#define INCLUDE_SET BIT(1)
> > +#define EXCLUDE_SET BIT(2)
> > +
> > +} igt_ftrace = { -1 };
> > +
> 
> 
> 
> Why are those #defines inside the struct definition?

They are part of the definition for @flags. It's common enough practice,
since I keep badgering people to do the same.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux