Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Due to a mix-up in kernel branches being used, I'd mangled Jason's
original CCS test to hopelessly overallocate the CCS surface size.
Restore it back to its original.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/kms_ccs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_ccs.c b/tests/kms_ccs.c
index 0524a43e..a40d6c10 100644
--- a/tests/kms_ccs.c
+++ b/tests/kms_ccs.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void display_fb(data_t *data, int compressed)
f.pitches[1] = ALIGN(width * 1, 128);
f.modifier[1] = modifier;
f.offsets[1] = size[0];
- size[1] = f.pitches[1] * ALIGN(f.height, 32);
+ size[1] = f.pitches[1] * ALIGN(height, 32);
f.handles[0] = gem_create(data->drm_fd, size[0] + size[1]);
f.handles[1] = f.handles[0];
--
2.13.4
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
