On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:38:06AM +0300, Tomi Sarvela wrote: > On 03/08/17 18:34, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > This approach died, we just run everything there is (and use that to > > apply some serious darwinian pressure onto testcase to prove > > themselves). > > > > Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > -- > > CI folks, pls ack. > > > > Thanks, Daniel > > --- > > tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist | 1859 -------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 1859 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > > > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 17eed013f810..000000000000 > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist > > +++ /dev/null > > Acked-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx> And pushed, thanks, with the small drive-by addition of removing extended.testlist also from README. -- Petri Latvala _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
