Hey, Op 01-08-17 om 08:46 schreef Mahesh Kumar: > Hi, > > As per my understanding "get_existing_*_state == get_new_*_state" > > It looks like you are trying to use currently available unused wrapper for completely different purpose. But IMHO you should create a new wrapper for get_old_state > > & this should be renamed to get_new_state. :) This really depends, and is the reason why we have to rename this. Before commit: get_existing_state == get_new_state After commit: get_existing_state == get_old_state. Perhaps I can add both in this patch, I'll clean the series up slightly. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
