Hi Maarten, On Wednesday 26 Jul 2017 14:53:33 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 19 Jul 2017 16:39:16 Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > for_each_obj_in_state is about to be removed, so use the correct new > > iterator macros. > > > > Also look at new_plane_state instead of plane->state when looking up > > the hw planes in use. They should be the same except when reallocating, > > (in which case this code is skipped) and we should really stop looking > > at obj->state whenever possible. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Actually compile correctly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I plan to send a pull request to Dave in the middle of next week with a bunch of rcar-du-drm patches that will generate a few conflicts with this one. They're all simple to solve as they're located in comments, but that will be annoying nonetheless. I can include a rebased version of this patch in my pull request if it can help, depending on when you plan to get this series merged in drm-misc-next. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
