Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/i915: Implement I915_PERF_ADD/REMOVE_CONFIG interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/07/17 19:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-07-18 17:50:42)
  static struct drm_driver driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 2b824f8875c4..607484737f3d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1917,6 +1917,9 @@ struct i915_oa_config {
         struct attribute_group sysfs_metric;
         struct attribute *attrs[2];
         struct device_attribute sysfs_metric_id;
+
+       /* Only updated while holding dev_priv->perf.metrics_lock. */
+       bool in_use;
Definitely do not get warm fuzzy feeling about this.

Would making this a regular refcount be difficult? It would for example
allow removing whilst it is still in use by a stream (just removing it
from the user table so new streams cannot be created with it). And stop
me from making helpful suggestions about how in_use access is purely
atomic...

Moved to atomic refcount.


+       oa_config = kzalloc(sizeof(*oa_config), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!oa_config) {
+               DRM_DEBUG("Failed to allocate memory for the OA config\n");
+               return -ENOMEM;
+       }
+
+       err = strncpy_from_user(oa_config->uuid, u64_to_user_ptr(args->uuid),
+                               UUID_STRING_LEN);
So you have a fixed size buffer, why have userspace pass a pointer
rather than an array? Try char uuid[UUID_STRING_LEN] in
struct drm_i915_perf_oa_config and see which you think is eaiser to use
and, more importantly, harder to get wrong.

Done.


+       if (err < 0) {
+               DRM_DEBUG("Failed to copy uuid from OA config\n");
+               goto mux_err;
+       }
+
+       if (!uuid_is_valid(oa_config->uuid)) {
+               DRM_DEBUG("Invalid uuid format for OA config\n");
+               err = -EINVAL;
+               goto mux_err;
+       }
+       idr_for_each_entry(&dev_priv->perf.metrics_idr, tmp, id) {
Comment that you don't expect many so this iteration shouldn't be too
costly.

Done.


+               if (!strcmp(tmp->uuid, oa_config->uuid)) {
+                       DRM_DEBUG("OA config already exists with this uuid\n");
+                       err = -EADDRINUSE;
+                       goto sysfs_err;
+               }
+       }
+
+       err = create_dynamic_oa_sysfs_entry(dev_priv, oa_config);
+       if (err) {
+               DRM_DEBUG("Failed to create sysfs entry for OA config\n");
+               goto sysfs_err;
+       }
+
+       oa_config->id = idr_alloc(&dev_priv->perf.metrics_idr,
+                                 oa_config, 2,
Comment on reserving 0 for invalid and 1 for default.

Done.


+}
+/**
+ * Structure to upload perf dynamic configuration into the kernel.
+ */
+struct drm_i915_perf_oa_config {
+       /** String formatted like "%08x-%04x-%04x-%04x-%012x" */
+       __u64 __user uuid;
Not a pointer, so __user is meaningless (and should generate warnings
from sparse). Equally it is nice to know in the name which of these are
encoding user pointers.

+       __u32 n_mux_regs;
+       __u32 pad0;
+       __u64 __user mux_regs;
+
+       __u32 n_boolean_regs;
+       __u32 pad1;
+       __u64 __user boolean_regs;
+
+       __u32 n_flex_regs;
+       __u32 pad2;
+       __u64 __user flex_regs;

With a little bit of rearranging you can reduce the padding.

Done.

-Chris


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux