Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-07-20 14:31:31) > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > When we wedge the device, we clear out the in-flight requests and > > advance the breadcrumb to indicate they are complete. However, the > > breadcrumb advance includes an assert that the engine is idle, so that > > advancement needs to be the last step to ensure we pass our own sanity > > checks. > > I am confused about this one. The previous patch seems to make > the concern void. Yeah, I moved the assert around, but still felt the order imposed by the memory of that assert was better. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
